DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda Premacy vs 2003 Daewoo Rezzo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Premacy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeDaewoo
PremacyModelRezzo
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
170 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
101 HPPower136 HP
230 NmTorque184 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption12 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4340 mmLength4350 mm
1710 mmWidth1750 mm
1570 mmHeight1580 mm
1380 KgWeight1270 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda Premacy and 2003 Daewoo Rezzo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Premacy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…