DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mazda MX-6 vs 1998 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 156

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeAlfa Romeo
MX-6Model156
1998Model year1998
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
204 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
115 HPPower105 HP
170 NmTorque255 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption7,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,7 lt
8 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 88 HTyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4615 mmLength4430 mm
1750 mmWidth1745 mm
1310 mmHeight1415 mm
1120 KgWeight1270 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mazda MX-6 and 1998 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 156 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…