DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Mazda MX-6 vs 1997 Volvo 940 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 940

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MX-6SpecificationVolvo 940
MazdaMakeVolvo
MX-6Model940
1997Model year1997
CoupeBody typeEstate
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Mazda MX-6SpecificationVolvo 940
10,4 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
204 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement2383 cc
115 HPPower122 HP
170 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MX-6SpecificationVolvo 940
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
8 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MX-6SpecificationVolvo 940
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 88 HTyre size185/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MX-6SpecificationVolvo 940
4615 mmLength4871 mm
1750 mmWidth1750 mm
1310 mmHeight1411 mm
1120 KgWeight1440 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Mazda MX-6 and 1997 Volvo 940 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…