DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mazda MX-6 vs 1994 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen XM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeCitroen
MX-6ModelXM
1994Model year1994
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
204 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement2088 cc
115 HPPower110 HP
170 NmTorque243 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption7,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5 lt
8 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 88 HTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4615 mmLength4710 mm
1750 mmWidth1795 mm
1310 mmHeight1385 mm
1120 KgWeight1380 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mazda MX-6 and 1994 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…