DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Mazda MX-5 vs 2011 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo S40
MazdaMakeVolvo
MX-5ModelS40
2011Model year2011
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo S40
7,6 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
213 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
161 HPPower150 HP
188 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo S40
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/45 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo S40
4020 mmLength4476 mm
1720 mmWidth1770 mm
—Height1454 mm
1090 KgWeight1498 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Mazda MX-5 and 2011 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…