DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda MX-5 vs 2004 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–58.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo V50
MazdaMakeVolvo
MX-5ModelV50
2004Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo V50
8,4 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
208 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
146 HPPower136 HP
168 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank52 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo V50
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/50 R15 84 V; 205/45 ZR16 83 WTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MX-5SpecificationVolvo V50
3975 mmLength4522 mm
1680 mmWidth1845 mm
1220 mmHeight1457 mm
1065 KgWeight1472 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda MX-5 and 2004 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…