DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mazda MX-5 vs 2002 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeLand Rover
MX-5ModelFreelander
2002Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

8,4 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
208 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
146 HPPower117 HP
168 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/50 R15 84 V; 205/45 ZR16 83 WTyre size195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3975 mmLength4368 mm
1680 mmWidth1809 mm
1220 mmHeight1708 mm
1065 KgWeight1510 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mazda MX-5 and 2002 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…