DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-5 vs 2000 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeHonda
MX-5ModelSm-x
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
2Seats4
2Doors4

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
191 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
125 HPPower131 HP
142 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption8,93 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,43 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/60 R14 82 HTyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

3975 mmLength3950 mm
1680 mmWidth1695 mm
1220 mmHeight1750 mm
1035 KgWeight1330 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-5 and 2000 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…