DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda MX-5 vs 2004 Ford Fusion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
MX-5ModelFusion
2004Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
191 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
110 HPPower90 HP
134 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14 82 HTyre size195/60 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

3975 mmLength4020 mm
1680 mmWidth1708 mm
1225 mmHeight1503 mm
1035 KgWeight1105 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2488 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda MX-5 and 2004 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…