DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda MX-3 vs 1996 Opel Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–45.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeOpel
MX-3ModelVectra
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
179 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
90 HPPower82 HP
135 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
9 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4220 mmLength4495 mm
1695 mmWidth1707 mm
1310 mmHeight1425 mm
1040 KgWeight1260 Kg
2455 mmWheelbase2637 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda MX-3 and 1996 Opel Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…