DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mazda MX-3 vs 2000 Daihatsu Charade Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daihatsu Charade

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeDaihatsu
MX-3ModelCharade
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
197 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
105 HPPower105 HP
135 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
9 ltUrban consumption8 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/60 R14 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4220 mmLength3750 mm
1695 mmWidth1620 mm
1310 mmHeight1390 mm
1060 KgWeight835 Kg
2455 mmWheelbase2395 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mazda MX-3 and 2000 Daihatsu Charade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daihatsu Charade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…