DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mazda MX-3 vs 1994 Fiat Croma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFiat
MX-3ModelCroma
1994Model year1994
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
197 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1929 cc
105 HPPower94 HP
135 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
9 ltUrban consumption6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4220 mmLength4520 mm
1695 mmWidth1760 mm
1310 mmHeight1430 mm
1060 KgWeight1240 Kg
2455 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mazda MX-3 and 1994 Fiat Croma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…