DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mazda MX-3 vs 1992 Geo Storm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MX-3SpecificationGeo Storm
MazdaMakeGeo
MX-3ModelStorm
1992Model year1992
CoupeBody typeCoupe
2+2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

Mazda MX-3SpecificationGeo Storm
8,5 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
197 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
105 HPPower130 HP
135 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MX-3SpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank47 lt
9 ltUrban consumption13 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MX-3SpecificationGeo Storm
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MX-3SpecificationGeo Storm
4220 mmLength4150 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1310 mmHeight1300 mm
1060 KgWeight1010 Kg
2455 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mazda MX-3 and 1992 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…