DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mazda MPV vs 1994 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MPV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MPVSpecificationOpel Omega
MazdaMakeOpel
MPVModelOmega
1994Model year1994
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Mazda MPVSpecificationOpel Omega
—0–100 km/h8,5 s
170 km/hTop speed243 km/h
2954 ccEngine displacement2962 cc
154 HPPower211 HP
230 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MPVSpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption15,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
11,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MPVSpecificationOpel Omega
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MPVSpecificationOpel Omega
4465 mmLength4785 mm
1826 mmWidth1785 mm
1694 mmHeight1450 mm
1831 KgWeight1605 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mazda MPV and 1994 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MPV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…