DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda MPV vs 1998 Land Rover Defender Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MPV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

56.25–55.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeLand Rover
MPVModelDefender
1996Model year1998
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats6
4Doors2

Performance

13,9 s0–100 km/h17,5 s
185 km/hTop speed130 km/h
2954 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
148 HPPower122 HP
230 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
74 ltFuel tank60 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
9,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,8 lt
—Average consumption10,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size205/80 R16 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4670 mmLength3880 mm
1825 mmWidth1790 mm
1750 mmHeight2059 mm
1710 KgWeight1870 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda MPV and 1998 Land Rover Defender approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MPV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…