DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda MPV vs 1996 Holden Frontera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MPV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeHolden
MPVModelFrontera
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

13,9 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
185 km/hTop speed147 km/h
2954 ccEngine displacement2771 cc
148 HPPower113 HP
230 NmTorque260 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
74 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption—
9,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption16 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4670 mmLength4192 mm
1825 mmWidth1780 mm
1750 mmHeight1721 mm
1710 KgWeight1828 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2330 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda MPV and 1996 Holden Frontera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MPV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…