DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mazda MPV vs 1999 Opel Campo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MPV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MPVSpecificationOpel Campo
MazdaMakeOpel
MPVModelCampo
1999Model year1999
MinivanBody typePick-up
7Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Mazda MPVSpecificationOpel Campo
16,4 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2255 cc
115 HPPower98 HP
277 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MPVSpecificationOpel Campo
DieselFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MPVSpecificationOpel Campo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda MPVSpecificationOpel Campo
4670 mmLength4980 mm
1825 mmWidth1690 mm
1750 mmHeight1710 mm
1775 KgWeight—
2805 mmWheelbase3025 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mazda MPV and 1999 Opel Campo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MPV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…