DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda MPV vs 2016 Volvo V60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MPV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo V60
MazdaMakeVolvo
MPVModelV60
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeEstate
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo V60
—0–100 km/h9,4 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
203 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo V60
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank67 lt
—Urban consumption6,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo V60
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
215/55 R18Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo V60
4870 mmLength4635 mm
1850 mmWidth1825 mm
1685 mmHeight1484 mm
—Weight1731 Kg
2950 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda MPV and 2016 Volvo V60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MPV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…