DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda MPV vs 2010 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MPV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo S80
MazdaMakeVolvo
MPVModelS80
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo S80
—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
163 HPPower175 HP
203 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo S80
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption9,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo S80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
215/55 R18Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MPVSpecificationVolvo S80
4870 mmLength4851 mm
1850 mmWidth1861 mm
1685 mmHeight1493 mm
—Weight1647 Kg
2950 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda MPV and 2010 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MPV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…