DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda MPV vs 2004 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MPVSpecificationRover 25
MazdaMakeRover
MPVModel25
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Mazda MPVSpecificationRover 25
13,2 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
176 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
136 HPPower113 HP
310 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MPVSpecificationRover 25
DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MPVSpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MPVSpecificationRover 25
4805 mmLength3990 mm
1830 mmWidth1688 mm
1785 mmHeight1419 mm
1807 KgWeight1130 Kg
2840 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda MPV and 2004 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…