DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MPV vs 2000 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MPV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MPVSpecificationHonda Sm-x
MazdaMakeHonda
MPVModelSm-x
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeMinivan
7Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda MPVSpecificationHonda Sm-x
14,2 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
122 HPPower131 HP
175 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MPVSpecificationHonda Sm-x
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption8,93 lt
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,43 lt
10,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MPVSpecificationHonda Sm-x
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda MPVSpecificationHonda Sm-x
4750 mmLength3950 mm
1830 mmWidth1695 mm
1775 mmHeight1750 mm
1600 KgWeight1330 Kg
2840 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MPV and 2000 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MPV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…