DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mazda Millenia vs 2002 Ford Contour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Contour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
MilleniaModelContour
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
200 HPPower165 HP
224 NmTorque217 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank61 lt
10,31 ltUrban consumption—
—Average consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/55 R16 VTyre size195/65 R14V
YesABS—

Dimensions

4870 mmLength4658 mm
1770 mmWidth1749 mm
1395 mmHeight1374 mm
1500 KgWeight1400 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mazda Millenia and 2002 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…