DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda Millenia vs 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeOldsmobile
MilleniaModelCutlass
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h—
222 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2255 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
213 HPPower162 HP
285 NmTorque210 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears3
215/55 R16 VTyre size195/75 R14 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4821 mmLength4900 mm
1770 mmWidth1805 mm
1395 mmHeight1350 mm
1560 KgWeight1445 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda Millenia and 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…