DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mazda Eunos Cosmo vs 1996 Nissan Skyline Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Eunos Cosmo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeNissan
Eunos CosmoModelSkyline
1994Model year1996
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

230 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2616 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
230 HPPower250 HP
294 NmTorque294 Nm
—Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank65 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/60 R15 VTyre size205/55 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4815 mmLength4720 mm
1795 mmWidth1720 mm
1305 mmHeight1360 mm
1510 KgWeight1380 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mazda Eunos Cosmo and 1996 Nissan Skyline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Eunos Cosmo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…