DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mazda Demio vs 2000 Mitsubishi Colt Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Colt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMitsubishi
DemioModelColt
1998Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

13,1 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
170 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1324 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
72 HPPower75 HP
105 NmTorque108 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank50 lt
7 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size175/70R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3815 mmLength3900 mm
1670 mmWidth1680 mm
1535 mmHeight1365 mm
950 KgWeight945 Kg
2390 mmWheelbase2415 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mazda Demio and 2000 Mitsubishi Colt approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…