DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Mazda Demio vs 2002 Ford Fusion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Demio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
DemioModelFusion
2001Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
151 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1323 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
63 HPPower68 HP
103 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
43 ltFuel tank45 lt
9 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/60R14Tyre size195/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3815 mmLength4020 mm
1670 mmWidth1708 mm
1535 mmHeight1503 mm
960 KgWeight1105 Kg
2390 mmWheelbase2488 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Mazda Demio and 2002 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Demio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…