1998 • Mazda
Demio
Mazda Demio 1.3 16V (63 Hp) 1998Overall Score46.25/100
1998 Mazda Demio vs 2000 Zastava Yugo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Zastava
Yugo
Zastava Yugo 1.3 (65 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Zastava Yugo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda DemioSpecificationZastava Yugo
MazdaMakeZastava
DemioModelYugo
1998Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Mazda DemioSpecificationZastava Yugo
14,0 s0–100 km/h14,5 s
151 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1323 ccEngine displacement1302 cc
63 HPPower65 HP
103 NmTorque98 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda DemioSpecificationZastava Yugo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank32 lt
9 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda DemioSpecificationZastava Yugo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/60R14Tyre size155/70 R13
Dimensions
Mazda DemioSpecificationZastava Yugo
3815 mmLength3490 mm
1670 mmWidth1540 mm
1535 mmHeight1340 mm
960 KgWeight840 Kg
2390 mmWheelbase2150 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Mazda Demio and 2000 Zastava Yugo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Zastava Yugo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…