DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-9 vs 2014 Fiat Freemont Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Freemont

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFiat
CX-9ModelFreemont
2016Model year2014
SUVBody typeSUV
7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,4 s
0 km/hTop speed208 km/h
3726 ccEngine displacement3605 cc
273 HPPower280 HP
270 NmTorque342 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption15,9 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
—Average consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
245/60 R18Tyre size225/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5232 mmLength4910 mm
1935 mmWidth1878 mm
1727 mmHeight1705 mm
1958 KgWeight2031 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase2890 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-9 and 2014 Fiat Freemont approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Freemont leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…