DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mazda CX-9 vs 2012 Subaru Tribeca Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Tribeca

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSubaru
CX-9ModelTribeca
2015Model year2012
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,9 s
0 km/hTop speed207 km/h
3726 ccEngine displacement3630 cc
273 HPPower258 HP
270 NmTorque350 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank64 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption16,2 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,0 lt
—Average consumption11,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
245/60 R18Tyre size255/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5232 mmLength4865 mm
1935 mmWidth1880 mm
1727 mmHeight1685 mm
1958 KgWeight1908 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mazda CX-9 and 2012 Subaru Tribeca approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Tribeca leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…