DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mazda CX-9 vs 2014 RAM 1500 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

RAM 1500

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda CX-9SpecificationRAM 1500
MazdaMakeRAM
CX-9Model1500
2015Model year2014
SUVBody typePick-up
7Seats5-6
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda CX-9SpecificationRAM 1500
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3726 ccEngine displacement3604 cc
273 HPPower305 HP
270 NmTorque364 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda CX-9SpecificationRAM 1500
PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank98 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption—
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda CX-9SpecificationRAM 1500
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8
245/60 R18Tyre size265/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda CX-9SpecificationRAM 1500
5232 mmLength6043 mm
1935 mmWidth—
1727 mmHeight1965 mm
1958 KgWeight—
2875 mmWheelbase3795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mazda CX-9 and 2014 RAM 1500 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, RAM 1500 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…