DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mazda CX-9 vs 2014 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
CX-9ModelTaurus
2015Model year2014
SUVBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3726 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
273 HPPower288 HP
270 NmTorque344 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank72 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 SelectShift
245/60 R18Tyre size255/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5232 mmLength5154 mm
1935 mmWidth1935 mm
1727 mmHeight1542 mm
1958 KgWeight1800 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase2868 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mazda CX-9 and 2014 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…