DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mazda CX-9 vs 2013 Chrysler 300 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler 300

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeChrysler
CX-9Model300
2015Model year2013
SUVBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,0 s
0 km/hTop speed240 km/h
3726 ccEngine displacement3604 cc
273 HPPower286 HP
270 NmTorque340 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank72 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption14,3 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears8
245/60 R18Tyre size245/45 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5232 mmLength5066 mm
1935 mmWidth1902 mm
1727 mmHeight1462 mm
1958 KgWeight1828 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase3052 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mazda CX-9 and 2013 Chrysler 300 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler 300 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…