DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mazda CX-9 vs 2012 Chevrolet Traverse Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Traverse

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeChevrolet
CX-9ModelTraverse
2015Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV, Crossover
7Seats7/8
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3726 ccEngine displacement3564 cc
273 HPPower281 HP
270 NmTorque361 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank83 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 Hydra-Matic 6T75
245/60 R18Tyre size245/70 R17; 255/65 R18; 255/55 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5232 mmLength5206 mm
1935 mmWidth—
1727 mmHeight1846 mm
1958 KgWeight2141 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase3019 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mazda CX-9 and 2012 Chevrolet Traverse approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Traverse leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…