DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mazda CX-9 vs 2013 Chevrolet Impala Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Impala

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeChevrolet
CX-9ModelImpala
2015Model year2013
SUVBody typeSedan
7Seats5/6
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3726 ccEngine displacement3556 cc
273 HPPower300 HP
270 NmTorque355 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol / Ethanol – E85
76 ltFuel tank66 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,0 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/60 R18Tyre size225/60 R16; 225/55 R17; 235/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5232 mmLength5090 mm
1935 mmWidth1851 mm
1727 mmHeight1491 mm
1958 KgWeight1613-1655 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase2807 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mazda CX-9 and 2013 Chevrolet Impala approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Impala leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…