DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-9 vs 2015 Ariel Nomad Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ariel Nomad

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeAriel
CX-9ModelNomad
2016Model year2015
SUVBody typeSUV
7Seats2
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h3,4 s
0 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2354 cc
250 HPPower235 HP
310 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption—
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
255/60 R18; 255/50 R20Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

5065 mmLength3215 mm
1969 mmWidth1850 mm
1716-1753 mmHeight1425 mm
1969 KgWeight670 Kg
2930 mmWheelbase2348 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-9 and 2015 Ariel Nomad approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ariel Nomad leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…