DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda CX-7 vs 2014 Toyota GT 86 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-7

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeToyota
CX-7ModelGT 86
2012Model year2014
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
5Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,5 s
0 km/hTop speed226 km/h
2260 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
260 HPPower200 HP
380 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
69 ltFuel tank50 lt
13 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—TransmissionAT
235/60 R18Tyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4675 mmLength4240 mm
1872 mmWidth1775 mm
1645 mmHeight1285 mm
1782 KgWeight1287 kg
—Luggage capacity218 lt
2750 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Mazda CX-7

No additional feature records are available.

Toyota GT 86Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsLight SensorFolding MirrorsXenon HeadlightsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda CX-7 and 2014 Toyota GT 86 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…