DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Mazda CX-7 vs 2004 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda CX-7SpecificationVolvo S60
MazdaMakeVolvo
CX-7ModelS60
2007Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda CX-7SpecificationVolvo S60
8,2 s0–100 km/h6,8 s
211 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2319 cc
260 HPPower250 HP
380 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda CX-7SpecificationVolvo S60
PetrolFuel typePetrol
69 ltFuel tank70 lt
14 ltUrban consumption12,7 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
10,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda CX-7SpecificationVolvo S60
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/55 R19Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda CX-7SpecificationVolvo S60
4700 mmLength4576 mm
1870 mmWidth1804 mm
1645 mmHeight1428 mm
1740 KgWeight1537 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Mazda CX-7 and 2004 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…