E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mazda CX-5 vs 2017 Mini Convertible Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

73.25–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda CX-5SpecificationMini Convertible
MazdaMakeMini
CX-5ModelConvertible
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

Mazda CX-5SpecificationMini Convertible
9,2 s0–100 km/h7,7 s
187 km/hTop speed218 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
160 HPPower170 HP
208 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda CX-5SpecificationMini Convertible
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank44 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption5,0 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda CX-5SpecificationMini Convertible
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 Steptronic
ATTransmission—
19Tyre size195/55 R16 87W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda CX-5SpecificationMini Convertible
4555 mmLength3850 mm
1840 mmWidth1727 mm
1670 mmHeight1415 mm
1460 kgWeight1230 Kg
503 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2495 mm

Additional Features

Mazda CX-5Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsFront Parking SensorsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsSunroofUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mazda CX-5 and 2017 Mini Convertible approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Image unavailableVSImage unavailableVolvo XC60 vs Mazda CX-52017 and 2017 model years2017 Jaguar F-PaceVSImage unavailableJaguar F-Pace vs Mazda CX-52017 and 2017 model years2017 Mazda 6VSImage unavailableMazda 6 vs Mazda CX-52017 and 2017 model years2017 Citroen C4VSImage unavailableCitroen C4 vs Mazda CX-52017 and 2017 model years2017 Citroen C5VSImage unavailableCitroen C5 vs Mazda CX-52017 and 2017 model years

Comments are loading…