DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mazda CX-5 vs 2017 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMitsubishi
CX-5ModelASX
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
192 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2268 cc
192 HPPower150 HP
256 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength4355 mm
1840 mmWidth1810 mm
1710 mmHeight1640 mm
1440 KgWeight1520 Kg
2070 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mazda CX-5 and 2017 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…