2017 • Mazda
CX-5
Mazda CX-5 2.5i (192 Hp) 2017Overall Score68.25/100
2017 Mazda CX-5 vs 2017 Acura ILX Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Acura
ILX
Acura ILX 2.4 (201 Hp) 2017Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CX-5SpecificationAcura ILX
MazdaMakeAcura
CX-5ModelILX
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda CX-5SpecificationAcura ILX
8,0 s0–100 km/h6,3 s
192 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2354 cc
192 HPPower201 HP
256 NmTorque244 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CX-5SpecificationAcura ILX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda CX-5SpecificationAcura ILX
4555 mmLength4620 mm
1840 mmWidth1794 mm
1710 mmHeight1412 mm
1440 KgWeight1403-1423 Kg
2070 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Mazda CX-5 and 2017 Acura ILX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableKia Sorento vs Mazda CX-52017 and 2017 model years
VSImage unavailableSubaru Outback vs Mazda CX-52017 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableAcura ILX vs Mazda CX-52017 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableMitsubishi L 200 vs Mazda CX-52017 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableMitsubishi ASX vs Mazda CX-52017 and 2017 model yearsComments are loading…