DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-5 vs 2016 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMitsubishi
CX-5ModelL 200
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
192 km/hTop speed169 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2442 cc
192 HPPower154 HP
256 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank75 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength5195 mm
1840 mmWidth1785 mm
1710 mmHeight1775 mm
1440 KgWeight1805 Kg
2070 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-5 and 2016 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…