2015 • Mazda
CX-5
Mazda CX-5 2.5i (192 Hp) 2015Overall Score68.25/100
2015 Mazda CX-5 vs 2014 Nissan Murano Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • Nissan
Murano
Nissan Murano 2.5 dCi (190 Hp) 2014Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Murano
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
68.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CX-5SpecificationNissan Murano
MazdaMakeNissan
CX-5ModelMurano
2015Model year2014
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda CX-5SpecificationNissan Murano
8,0 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
192 km/hTop speed196 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
192 HPPower190 HP
256 NmTorque450 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CX-5SpecificationNissan Murano
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank82 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption8,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda CX-5SpecificationNissan Murano
4555 mmLength4860 mm
1840 mmWidth1885 mm
1710 mmHeight1720 mm
1440 KgWeight1875 Kg
2070 mmWheelbase2825 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Mazda CX-5 and 2014 Nissan Murano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Murano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableKia Sorento vs Mazda CX-52015 and 2015 model years
VSImage unavailableSubaru Outback vs Mazda CX-52015 and 2015 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableLexus RX vs Mazda CX-52015 and 2015 model years
VSImage unavailableMazda 6 vs Mazda CX-52014 and 2015 model yearsVSImage unavailableNissan Murano vs Mazda CX-52014 and 2015 model yearsComments are loading…