2015 • Mazda
CX-5
Mazda CX-5 2.5i (192 Hp) 2015Overall Score68.25/100
2015 Mazda CX-5 vs 2014 Jeep Wrangler Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • Jeep
Wrangler
Jeep Wrangler 2.8 CRDi (197 Hp) 2014Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Jeep Wrangler
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
68.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CX-5SpecificationJeep Wrangler
MazdaMakeJeep
CX-5ModelWrangler
2015Model year2014
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda CX-5SpecificationJeep Wrangler
8,0 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
192 km/hTop speed172 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2776 cc
192 HPPower197 HP
256 NmTorque460 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CX-5SpecificationJeep Wrangler
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank85 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda CX-5SpecificationJeep Wrangler
4555 mmLength4751 mm
1840 mmWidth1877 mm
1710 mmHeight1840 mm
1440 KgWeight2053 Kg
2070 mmWheelbase2946 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Mazda CX-5 and 2014 Jeep Wrangler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableKia Sorento vs Mazda CX-52015 and 2015 model years
VSImage unavailableSubaru Outback vs Mazda CX-52015 and 2015 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableLexus RX vs Mazda CX-52015 and 2015 model years
VSImage unavailableMazda 6 vs Mazda CX-52014 and 2015 model years
VSImage unavailableNissan Murano vs Mazda CX-52014 and 2015 model yearsComments are loading…