DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-5 vs 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.75–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeLand Rover
CX-5ModelRange Rover Evoque
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV, Crossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
202 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2191 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
380 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank54 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,6 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength4371 mm
1840 mmWidth1985 mm
1710 mmHeight1660 mm
1420 KgWeight1608 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-5 and 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…