DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mazda CX-5 vs 2015 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
CX-5ModelRanger
2015Model year2015
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h—
207 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
175 HPPower160 HP
420 NmTorque385 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank80 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption—
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength5362 mm
1840 mmWidth1860 mm
1710 mmHeight1815 mm
1530 KgWeight1883 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase3220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mazda CX-5 and 2015 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…