DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda CX-5 vs 2013 BMW X3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda CX-5SpecificationBMW X3
MazdaMakeBMW
CX-5ModelX3
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda CX-5SpecificationBMW X3
9,2 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
202 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
380 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda CX-5SpecificationBMW X3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank67 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda CX-5SpecificationBMW X3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/60 R17 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda CX-5SpecificationBMW X3
4555 mmLength4648 mm
1840 mmWidth1881 mm
1710 mmHeight1661 mm
1445 KgWeight1660 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda CX-5 and 2013 BMW X3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…