DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mazda CX-3 vs 2017 Suzuki Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 2.75 points.

67.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSuzuki
CX-3ModelVitara
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
172 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1373 cc
105 HPPower140 HP
270 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank47 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
ATTransmission—
18Tyre size215/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4275 mmLength4175 mm
1765 mmWidth1775 mm
1535 mmHeight1610 mm
1295 kgWeight1210 Kg
350 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2500 mm

Additional Features

Mazda CX-3Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless StartPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mazda CX-3 and 2017 Suzuki Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 2.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…