DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2018 Mazda CX-3 vs 2022 Ford EcoSport Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford EcoSport

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3.5 points.

62.25–65.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
CX-3ModelEcoSport
2018Model year2022
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
177 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement998 cc
105 HPPower125 HP
270 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank52 lt
4,4 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
4,0 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
6Gears6
—TransmissionAT
—Tyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4275 mmLength4096 mm
1765 mmWidth1816 mm
1535 mmHeight1713 mm
1200 KgWeight1249 kg
—Luggage capacity356 lt
2570 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Mazda CX-3

No additional feature records are available.

Ford EcoSportDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2018 Mazda CX-3 and 2022 Ford EcoSport approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford EcoSport leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…