DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mazda Cronos vs 1991 Audi Coupe Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–66.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeAudi
CronosModelCoupe
1992Model year1991
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,5 s
205 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
160 HPPower160 HP
180 NmTorque195 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption11 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R14 89 HTyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4695 mmLength4366 mm
1770 mmWidth1716 mm
1400 mmHeight1370 mm
1220 KgWeight1350 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mazda Cronos and 1991 Audi Coupe approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…