DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mazda Cronos vs 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeOldsmobile
CronosModelCutlass
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

205 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
160 HPPower162 HP
180 NmTorque210 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 89 HTyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4695 mmLength4555 mm
1770 mmWidth1700 mm
1400 mmHeight1330 mm
1220 KgWeight1160 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mazda Cronos and 1992 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…